Paulsen v. Manson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
This is an appeal from the granting of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the Superior Court. The petition alleged that, because the record of the plea hearing failed to include a factual basis for the crime of assault in the first degree, the petitioner’s plea of guilty to that offense was accepted in violation of his rights under the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution. We find error in the conclusion of the habeas court that such a factual basis is a constitutional requisite to a valid guilty plea.
*486The petitioner, Ronald E. Paulsen, was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. LinaresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.