Wright v. May
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Yellow Medicine county to recover $64.02 for services as auctioneers. From an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, Qvale, J., plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
Plaintiffs, who were residents of South Dakota, performed services for defendant at his request as auctioneers. Defendant resides in Yellow Medicine county, Minnesota, and the services were performed in the sale in that county of personal property of defendant. This action was brought to recover $64.02, the agreed price of such services. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained and plaintiffs appealed.
The sole question involved is the constitutionality of G. S. 1913, §§ 6083 to 6088. Section 6083 provides that the county board or *151auditor may license any voter in its county as an auctioneer.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Commonwealth v. HanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Trageser v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Steinberg-Baum & Co. v. Dayton CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Weaver v. First National Bank of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Town of Bridgie v. County of KoochichingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Sam's Loan Office, Inc. v. City of BeaumontTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.