Legal Opinion
Steinberg-Baum & Co. v. Dayton Countryman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 9, 1956No. 48873PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.
This appeal involves, the constitutionality of chapter 546A, Code, 1954 (chapter 239, Acts 55th General Assembly, 1953), requiring a license to sell new merchandise at public auction. The Act, omitting parts not here important, provides :
“546A.1 License required. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to sell, * * * at public auction * * * any new merchandise, unless such person, firm or corporation * * * shall have first secured a license as herein provided and shall have complied with 'the regulations hereinafter set forth.
“546A.2 Application. Any person, firm or…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Emert v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Lee Enterprises, Inc v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Chicago Title Insurance Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.