Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 2006No. 06-473PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Donald Tyler, by and through his attorney, Glen Hoggard, has filed the instant motion for rule on clerk. Mr. Hoggard states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

While this court has in the past denied such motions in parental-termination cases due to their civil nature, we have since recognized a parent’s right to appeal from a termination order. See, e.g., Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004). We have further recognized an indigent parent’s right to counsel on appeal. See Linker-Flores v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Childers v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Moore v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flannery v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Harwell-Williams v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Flannery v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Latiolais v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Werts v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API