Legal Opinion

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 2004No. CA 03-1099PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Mary Linker-Flores’s counsel, Anne Orsi Smith, moves this court to be relieved as counsel in the appeal of Appellant’s termination of parental rights. Smith bases her motion on the assertions that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal and that she would incur substantial costs and expend great time, without the expectation of a flail recovery, in the pursuit of an appeal.

In 1989, the Arkansas General Assembly adopted the view that counsel shall be provided for indigent parents in termination cases “at all stages of the proceedings.” 1989 Ark. Acts 273, § 15, now codified at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Harwell-Williams v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Tyler v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Moore v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API