Legal Opinion

Latiolais v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 4, 2006No. 06-1297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Deann Latiolais brings this petition for review of the court of appeals’ dismissal of her appeal of an order terminating her parental rights. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal due to appellant’s failure to file a brief; thus, we will treat this petition as a motion for belated appeal. The record in this case was lodged on July 6, 2005; however, Latiolais’s counsel, Glen Hoggard, failed to file a brief or request an extension by the date on which the brief was due. Counsel Hoggard admits in this petition that the failure to file a brief or request an extension resulted from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Flannery v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Tyler v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Moore v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Martin v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. White v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICESSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API