Legal Opinion
Talarico v. Conkling
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 25, 1975PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiffs own a 1.1-acre parcel of land in Southbury which is improved by two separate commercial buildings. One building, two stories in height, is located on the front portion of the lot near the highway; the other structure, one and one-half stories in height, is located in the rear of the lot. The lot has a 200-foot frontage abutting routes 6 and 67. The defendant commissioner made a determination in 1969 that a widening of route 6 would require the acquisition of .06 of an acre of the plaintiffs’ land. The result of such taking would reduce the setback of the plaintiffs’ front…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Budney v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Ackerman v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Melody v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Meredith v. Police Commission of the Town of New CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Transportation Plaza Associates v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.