Legal Opinion

Mills v. Miller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Blackhawlc District Court. — HoN. A. S. Blair,. Judge. ActioN in equity to bave set- aside and decreed to be void certain chattel mortgages and a general assignment for the benefit of creditors. There was a hearing on the merits,. and a decree, from which the plaintiffs Mills & Gibb and , John Pullman & Co., appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

In August, 1896, the defendants M. P. Miller and Charles P. Daugherty were engaged as partners under 'the name of Miller & Daugherty, in carrying on the mercantile business at Washington and Waterloo, ’in this state. They had a stock of merchandise of considerable size at each place. Each partner assisted somewhat iri the supervision of the business at each place, but Miller resided at Washington, and exercised chief control of the stock there, while Daugherty, in like manner managed the stock at Waterloo', where he resided.' On the 27th day of 'August, the firm was financially embarrassed,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kenosha Stove Co. v. SheddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  2. Southern White-Lead Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  3. Letts, Fletcher & Co. v. McMasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Dahlman v. GreenwoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hunter v. WaynickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bartemeier v. Central National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Munson v. MabonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Franklin Bank v. Williams, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API