Legal Opinion

Southern White-Lead Co. v. Haas

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 27, 1887PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from, Dubuque District Court. Plaintiffs are judgment creditors of Junkerman & Haas. They brought this action to cancel and set aside three chattel mortgages executed in the name of that firm to defendant Peter Keine, and covering all the personal property belonging to the firm. The district court dismissed the petition. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeed, J.

For many years prior to the 2d of October, 1882, Otto Junkerman and Julius W. Haas were engaged in business as partners under the firm name of Junkerman & Haas. On that date they signed articles of copartnership with F. Baforth, Jr. As it is a question in the case whether a partnership with Baforth as a member was ever in fact constituted, it is material to set out some of the provisions of said articles. They are as follows:

“These articles of copartnership, made and entered into this 2d day of October, 1882, by and between Otto Junker-*401man, Julius W. Haas and ,F. Raforth, Jr., all of the city…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perry v. VezinaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Rollins v. Shaver Wagon & Carriage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Richards v. Schreiber, Conchar & Westphal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Hatheway v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. Ford v. OttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API