Hunter v. Waynick
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court. Action in equity. Decree for the plaintiff and intervenors. The defendant Kestler appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
The plaintiff and defendant Waynick were partners, engaged in the retail grocery business at Harlan. The plaintiff resided at Corning, and was occasionally at Harlan, and had some personal knowledge of the business. On the second day of February, 1884, the defendant Way-nick sold the goods, wares and merchandise, and all partnership property, to the appellant, Kestler, for the sum of $8,000. This sale was made without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff’, 'and he and the partnership creditors ask that it be set aside on the ground that it was fraudulent, and because the defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Loeb v. Pierpoint & TuttleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Letts, Fletcher & Co. v. McMasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Hartford Coal Co. v. HelsingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Huey & Philp v. FishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Mills v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Creath v. KolbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.