Munson v. Mabon
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Howard District Court. — ■ Hon. L. E. Fellows, Judge. Action at law, wherein plaintiff garnished one George Bachel as a supposed debtor of defendant, Mabon. W. O. Leuth inteiwened, claiming that the amount owing was due him from Bachel, and that the garnishee was not indebted to Mabon. The trial court found for intervener, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
Plaintiff holds a judgment against defendant, Mabon, and he garnished Bachel as a supposed debtor of Mabon, on the theory that he (Bachel) was indebted to Mabon for commissions earned by him in the sale of certain of defendant, Mabon’s, real estate. The intervener claims that he, and not Bachel, was and is entitled to the commissions, for that he, and not Bachel, sold the property. The case was submitted upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts, from which we extract the following as *336material to the controversy now before us: Prior to November, 1905, George Bachel, who was the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Seymour v. AultmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Mills v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Malone v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Allen v. RoachTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923