Legal Opinion
Nahass v. Harrison
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 13, 2016No. C.A. No. 15-12354-MLWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
I.SUMMARY
In this removed case, plaintiff Paul Na-hass, a shareholder and former director and officer of FlexLite Corporation (“Flex-Lite”), has sued defendants James Harrison, Gregory Quarles, Mitchell Cogert, and Lawrence Siegel, a group-of other Flex-Lite shareholders, for terminating Nahass as an officer and director of FlexLite. Na-hass alleges that his termination violated FlexLite’s coiporate bylaws (the “Bylaws”) and defendants’ fiduciary duties to Nahass as a minority shareholder in a close corporation. Defendants have moved to dismiss. They…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andrew Francoeur v. Warden of Federal Medical Center DevensDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- Orkin v. AlbertDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Orkin v. AlbertDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Pigulski v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- U.S. Bank, National Association, Trustee v. Foremost Insurance Company and Douglas C. Colby, Jr.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017