Legal Opinion

Pigulski v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided June 24, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01061Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Ann Pigulski v. Civil No. 18-cv-1061-LM Opinion No.

2019 DNH 097

Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc. O R D E R Ann Pigulski brings this product liability action against Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and its subsidiary, Ethicon, Inc., alleging claims for injuries caused by defendants’ pelvic mesh products. Pigulski asserts thirteen claims based on various theories of liability. Defendants move to dismiss eight of Pigulski’s claims. Pigulski objects. STANDARD OF REVIEW Under Rule 12(b)(6), the court must accept the factual allegations…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Foley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. David L. Reicher, D.P.M. Affiliated Podiatrists, P.A. v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America the Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Wyle v. LeesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API