Carlson Companies, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ORDER
LARSON, District Judge.
Carlson Companies, Inc., (Carlson) and thirteen of its subsidiaries have filed suit in this Court under §§ 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26 (1973)] for damages and injunctive relief under §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, as amended, [15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2 (1973)] and § 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. § 18 (1973)].
In an Order dated October 5, 1973, this Court denied defendant’s motion to compel discovery regarding: 1) Carlson’s estimate of its share of the trading stamp business; 2) Carlson’s tax payments and the tax…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Durkin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.