Legal Opinion

Carlson Companies, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1974No. 4-72-Civ. 327PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ORDER

LARSON, District Judge.

Carlson Companies, Inc., (Carlson) and thirteen of its subsidiaries have filed suit in this Court under §§ 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26 (1973)] for damages and injunctive relief under §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, as amended, [15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2 (1973)] and § 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. § 18 (1973)].

In an Order dated October 5, 1973, this Court denied defendant’s motion to compel discovery regarding: 1) Carlson’s estimate of its share of the trading stamp business; 2) Carlson’s tax payments and the tax…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  3. Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  4. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  5. Durkin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API