Legal Opinion

Hunter Tract Improvement Co. v. Stone

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1910No. 8645PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered November 13, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action to cancel an assignment of a contract, after a trial on the merits before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

Appellant platted, as Mount Baker addition to the city of Seattle, a tract of land adjoining Lake Washington, containing about two hundred and ten acres, and gave to the city of Seattle about twenty-five acres of this land' for parks and boulevards, including the lake frontage, and in other ways attempted to make it desirable for first-class residences, and a great many people had bought lots in said addition. One Marguerite Foy had secured a contract for the purchase of lot lé in block 18 in said addition, and had assigned the same to a woman of the negro race, Susie Stone, wife of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. La Rue v. GroezingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lockerby v. AmonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Glant v. Lloyd's Register of ShippingWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Burbank v. Pioneer Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Burleson v. BlankenshipWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Stone v. Hunter Tract Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API