Legal Opinion

Richard Walter Ricker and Oswald Bryan Salyer v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 14, 1968No. 23-67PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DURFEE, Judge.

Plaintiffs, retired Navy captains, seek to recover the difference between their retired pay and the active duty pay and allowances of Navy captains, commencing July 1, 1965, and continuing until such date as judgment may be entered. It is plaintiffs’ position here that their retirement was illegally effected on June 30, 1965, because a continuation board convened under the Act of August 11, 1959, P.L. 86-155, 73 Stat. 333 (which failed to recommend them for continuation on the active…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Greenway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Dilley v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  5. Joseph S. Neal v. Secretary of the Navy and Commandant of the Marine CorpsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API