Legal Opinion
State v. Kurt
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 7, 1991No. 71491PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKMAR, Chief Judge.
The defendant was convicted of driving with a suspended license, in violation of § 302.321, RSMo 1986.
The license was suspended pursuant to § 544.046, RSMo 1986, known as the “nonresident violators compact.” The statute, Art. IV, reads in pertinent part as follows:(a) Upon receipt of a report of a failure to comply from the licensing authority of the issuing jurisdiction, the licensing authority of the home jurisdiction shall notify the motorist and initiate a suspension action, in accordance with the home jurisdiction’s procedures, to suspend the motorist’s driver’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Stearns v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bode v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Koterba v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005