Legal Opinion

Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2005No. 20050103Published

1Opinion of the Court

706 N.W.2d 614 (2005)

2005 ND 204

David B. GRAY, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

NORTH DAKOTA GAME AND FISH DEPT., Defendant and Appellee.

No. 20050103.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

November 29, 2005.

Rehearing Denied December 20, 2005.

David B. Gray (pro se), Bismarck, N.D.

Dean J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellee.

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] David B. Gray appealed from a judgment[1] affirming the North Dakota Game and Fish Department's order suspending Gray's hunting, fishing, and trapping privileges in North Dakota from September 21,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API