Legal Opinion

Heitmuller v. Berkow

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 6, 1948No. 9490PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

In this case the appellee, tenant in an apartment house owned by the appellant in the District of Columbia, instituted in the Municipal Court for the District of Columbia a suit against the appellant under the District of Columbia Rent Control Act, D.C.Code (Supp. V 1946) §§ 45— 1601, et seq., for the recovery of double the amount of rent paid in excess of the maximum rent ceiling. He recovered a judgment which included an allowance of the sum of $50 for attorney’s fees. The appellant appealed to the Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. That…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maddrix v. DizeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. StanleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Lincoln Loan Service, Inc. v. Motor Credit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Grady v. PrewittDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Porter v. StraughtersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API