Legal Opinion

Lincoln Loan Service, Inc. v. Motor Credit Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1951No. 1099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause involved judgment entered in favor of a garnishee after trial on a traverse to the garnishee’s answer.. On August 29, 1951, 83 A.2d 230, we affirmed the judgment and the garnishee has now moved for the allowance of an attorney’s fee for services rendered in this court. The basis of the motion is-Code 1940, § 16-317, which provides: “ * * * in all such cases where judgments shall be entered for' the garnishee the plaintiff shall be adjudged to pay to the garnishee, in addition to the taxed costs, a reasonable counsel fee.”

The motion is opposed on the ground that the language of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maddrix v. DizeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  2. Lincoln Loan Service, Inc. v. Motor Credit Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Heitmuller v. BerkowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of New Mexico v. PriestleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bank of New Mexico v. Northwest Power Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. StanleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Porter v. StraughtersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Bank of New Mexico v. Northwest Power Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API