Legal Opinion
District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Stanley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2008No. 04-CV-1482PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The underlying facts of this case are fully stated in our opinion on the merits, 1 and need not be repeated to answer the question now presented: where should a petition to recover statutorily authorized attorney’s fees for work done on an appeal to this court normally be filed? Shortly after we remanded this case to the Superi- or Court with instructions to return the matter to the District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals for entry of an order reinstating appellees to their former positions with the Metropolitan Police Department, the appellees filed a “Motion to Remand to Superior…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Stephen Ustrak v. James W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Anthony Souza v. Bradford SouthworthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re OrshanskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Tenants of 710 Jefferson Street, NW v. District of Columbia Housing Commission and Steven LoneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In Re Al-BaseerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Rodriguez-Garcia v. Municipality of CaguasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- In re Edward T. Smith Bruce E. GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.