Legal Opinion
Maddrix v. Dize
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1946No. 5439, 5448PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
No. S439.
This appeal presents for determination the right of the attorney of an employee to receive additional compensation for services rendered in a suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., after judgment in the plaintiff’s favor in the District Court. The additional services were rendered upon an appeal by the defendant to this court and upon the transfer of the case by writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court where the judgment of the District Court was affirmed. The history of the case is summarized in the opinion of the District Court as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Luisa E. Silva v. Grant MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United Slate, Tile and Composition Roofers, Damp and Waterproof Workers Association, Local 307 v. G & M Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Levi Wright v. W. H. CarriggCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Hackett v. ADF Restaurant InvestmentsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Kirkpatrick v. Cardinal Innovations Healthcare SolutionsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.