Legal Opinion

Gloyd v. Rutherford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1963No. 36642PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiffs for an accounting by the defendants Rutherford and Butts, who are officers and directors of Metallo Sales & Manufacturing, Inc. Thereafter, on petition of the plaintiffs, a receiver was appointed to take charge of the property and affairs of the corporation.

When the receiver’s report was presented, it showed that the corporation had a possible claim against the defendant Rutherford, who was the president of the corporation, based upon a contract signed by him, under the terms of which he purchased 499,500 of the 500,000 authorized shares of stock.

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hunt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Klasko Finance Corp. v. Belleaire Hotel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Ex Rel. Cameron v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Buckner-Weatherby Co. v. WuestWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State ex rel. Krisch v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morse Electro Products Corp. v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. RutherfordWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. RichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Suleiman v. LasherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. In Re Orchards Village Investments, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API