Legal Opinion
Suleiman v. Lasher
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 6, 1987No. 17288-3-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, C.J.
Jusuf Suleiman appeals the trial court's dismissal of his action against Earl Lasher and A. Kyle Johnson, partners in the law firm of Lasher & Johnson, and one of their (former) employees, Paul Durham, which alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and legal malpractice. We affirm.
Facts
On June 19, 1979, Suleiman became the judgment creditor of Charles Cantino, doing business as Seattle Bird Importers, Inc., in the amount of $54,002. On May 9, 1980, G. Michael Sweet, of the law firm of Lasher & Johnson, was appointed as receiver of Cantino's property, to ensure collection of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Halvorson v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Yakima Fruit & Cold Storage Co. v. Central Heating & Plumbing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
- Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- P.E. Systems, LLC v. CPI Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Beaman v. Yakima Valley Disposal, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Sundance Corporation, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 1993
- Gaspar v. Peshastin Hi-Up GrowersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Gaspar v. Peshastin Hi-Up GrowersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.