Legal Opinion

State v. Rutherford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1964No. 37038PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

By writ of certiorari, petitioner, Wallace R. Rutherford, seeks review of an order denying his motion for a statement of facts and transcript at public expense in connection with his appeal of a criminal conviction. It is conceded that his appeal is nonfrivolous; hence, the sole issue presented upon this review is whether he qualifies as an indigent.

Petitioner, a promoter of various corporate enterprises, was charged with eight counts of violating the Securities Act of Washington (RCW 21.20). Pending trial, bail was set at $20,000, which he provided through personal sureties, supplemented at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In RE McNEAR v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. O'CONNOR v. MatzdorffWashington Supreme Court · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API