Legal Opinion

Altman v. Meridian Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1992No. 90316, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, C.J.

We address in this case the authority of a local governing body to disapprove a proposed subdivision plat pursuant to the Subdivision Control Act (sca), MCL 560.101 et seq.; MSA 26.430(101) et seq., and the scope of such a body’s authority to place conditions on the approval of such a plat consistent with this Court’s decision in Arrowhead Development Co v Livingston Co Road Comm, 413 Mich 505; 322 NW2d 702 (1982). We conclude that the local township board of trustees in this case acted within its authority under the sca and Arrowhead.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On December 15, 1987,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Franges v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Arrowhead Development Co. v. Livingston County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Adams Outdoor Advertising v. East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. Borchard-RuhlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gold v. Winget (In Re NM Holdings Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Western Michigan University Board of Control v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API