Horn v. Bray
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
The appellants instituted separate actions ■'in the court below, against the appellees, for contribution. These actions continued to be separate until they were at issue, when the court ordered their consolidation.
Bray made no defence in the court below, and the questions in this cause pertain to the liability of Lefever. The appellants’ several complaints were in three paragraphs. The complaints are identical, except as to names and some minor matters, and a substantial statement of one complaint will be sufficient. The motions made and the rulings of the ■court were the same in each case,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mallory v. . GillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Townsley v. SumrallSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- D'Wolf v. RabaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Hendrick v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- St. Louis & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. ValiriusIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Anderson v. SpenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Knopf v. MorelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Porter v. WaltzIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Minick v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.