Legal Opinion

Norton v. Coons

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1846PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Assumpsit tried before Parker, C. Judge, at the Rensselaer circuit, in April, 1844, The plaintiffs sued for contribution, as co-sureties with the defendant, in the following promissory note:— “ $1000. One year after date we jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Olive Bldridge one thousand dollars, for value received. Troy, March 31st, 1841, with interest. Schuyler & Akin. B. & A. Norton. Joseph H. Coons.” Schuyler & Akin were principal debtors.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit tried before Parker, C. Judge, at the Rensselaer circuit, in April, 1844, The plaintiffs sued for contribution, as co-sureties with the defendant, in the following promissory note:— “ $1000. One year after date we jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Olive Bldridge one thousand dollars, for value received. Troy, March 31st, 1841, with interest. Schuyler & Akin. B. & A. Norton. Joseph H. Coons.” Schuyler & Akin were principal debtors. They applied to Miss Eldridge for.the loan of $1000, and offered to give the plaintiffs as sureties; but she did not know them, and…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Bronson, Ch. J.

The doctrine of contribution among sureties is founded on a general principle of equity and justice. Sureties are in cequali jure, and must bear the burden equally. Contribution may be enforced whether they were bound jointly or severally; by the same, or by different instruments; and although the party who sues did not know at the time he became a surety, that the defendant was also a surety. The order of time in which they became bound is not a material inquiry. The only question is, whether they were in fact sureties for a principal debtor, and in relation to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. WarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Warner v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Lapham v. BarnesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1828

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Aspinwall v. . SacchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Barry v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  5. Rindge v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API