Kramer v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SPEER, Justice.
Appellee J. R. Wilson recovered a judgment entered on a jury special issue verdict against appellants, Rachel Kramer and A. A. Hingst, in different amounts. The named appellants have perfected this appeal.
In so far as it is" necessary to state here, the substance of appellee’s petition was, in first count, an action against A. T. Kramer, Rachel Kramer and A. A. Hingst to recover attorney’s fees Under a former contract for one-third of a recovery obtained by appellee for the named parties in a former suit; in a second count, and alternatively, Wilson sought recovery on quantum…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
- Scott v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Safety Casualty Co. v. TeetsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Dingfelder & Balish, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Laughnan v. Estate of LaughnanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Ingleside v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Matthews v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1961
- Sorrell v. Elsey, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Smith v. Pulliam, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Kendall Co. v. Plastic Engineering & Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.