Legal Opinion

Sorrell v. Elsey

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 31, 1988No. 04-87-00008-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAPA, Justice.

The motion for rehearing is denied. The motion for rehearing en banc is denied. However, our opinion of February 17, 1988 is withdrawn and replaced with the following opinion.

This is an appeal from a take nothing judgment where appellant Elizabeth Sorrell sued appellees William R. Elsey and Douglas Terry Elsey to set aside, cancel and rescind a certain deed executed by Sorrell to the Elseys. The cause of action, which was tried to the court, was based among other things on breach of a fiduciary duty. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were requested and filed. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Archer v. GriffithTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Moulton v. Alamo Ambulance Service, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Cooper v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of Townes v. TownesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. National Plan Administrators, Inc. v. National Health Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  3. Matherson v. Pope, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. Estate of Townes v. TownesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Estate of Townes v. TownesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API