Goldstein v. Goldstein (No. 2)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
Morris Goldstein brought an action in assumpsit to recover $725.55 for moneys loaned to, and expended for, his brother George S. Goldstein, the defendant. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $575. The defendant appealed.
The appellant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to grant his motion for a new trial. This assignment is defective as the motion and reasons upon which it is based are not set forth: Ward et al. v. Babbitt, Inc., 270 Pa. 370, 373, 113 A. 558; Sheldrake v. Hobson, 70 Pa. Superior Ct. 268. The remaining two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Stevens Et Ux. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Stevens Et Ux. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Ward v. Babbitt, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Sipior v. United States Glass Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rader v. PalletzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946