Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Goldstein (No. 2)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1943No. 2; Appeal, 164PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

Morris Goldstein brought an action in assumpsit to recover $725.55 for moneys loaned to, and expended for, his brother George S. Goldstein, the defendant. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $575. The defendant appealed.

The appellant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to grant his motion for a new trial. This assignment is defective as the motion and reasons upon which it is based are not set forth: Ward et al. v. Babbitt, Inc., 270 Pa. 370, 373, 113 A. 558; Sheldrake v. Hobson, 70 Pa. Superior Ct. 268. The remaining two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Stevens Et Ux. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Stevens Et Ux. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Ward v. Babbitt, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Sipior v. United States Glass Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rader v. PalletzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API