Legal Opinion

Sipior v. United States Glass Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1938No. Appeals, 65 and 66PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The single question raised on these appeals is ruled in favor of the respective appellants by principles clearly set forth in Kehres v. Stuempfle et al., 288 Pa. 534, 136 A. 794, and repeated and applied in Stevens et ux. v. Pittsburgh, 129 Pa. Superior Ct. 5, 21, 194 A. 563, affirmed 329 Pa. 496.

The action below was trespass by a husband and wife to recover damages for injuries to the wife who was struck on the head by a piece of glass as she traversed the sidewalk in front of defendant’s factory on South Eleventh Street, Pittsburgh.

The accident occurred on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kehres v. StuempfleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Saxman v. McCormickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Stevens Et Ux. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Boyd v. E. F. Houghton & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Indian v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Goldstein v. Goldstein (No. 2)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API