Rader v. Palletz

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

Jack J. Rader, plaintiff, brought this action in assumpsit against Lionel Palletz, defendant, to recover the sum of fl,562.50 claimed to be due by reason of the breach of an alleged oral contract entered into between them relating to commissions in connection with the sale of a property in. Philadelphia. Plaintiff and defendant were licensed real estate brokers.. The case was tried before a jury which rendered a verdict for plaintiff. The court in banc refused defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and a new trial. Defendant has appealed from the judgment entered on…