Legal Opinion
Cassidy v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided November 28, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 296PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
The motion to dismiss the complaint is before the Court for determination.
The question involved has been thoroughly briefed by the attorneys for the respective parties. The attorneys for defendant have requested that the Court hear oral arguments in addition to the briefs filed by the parties, but the Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by hearing oral arguments, and that the question should be disposed of upon the record and the briefs now before the Court.
Local Rule 8(c) provides:
“The moving party or party filing a response to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Harlow v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Pape v. Red Cab Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ring v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Cuttone v. PetersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Tipton v. BreadyDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1964
- Wood v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1959