Legal Opinion
Pape v. Red Cab Mutual Casualty Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 31, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
The plaintiff in a previous action against one Dunn recovered a judgment for personal injuries arising out of a taxicab accident. Notice of appeal was filed but no undertaking was furnished with no stay of execution resulting. This action was thereafter brought by the plaintiff against this defendant, which was Dunn’s insurer, under a policy issued and filed pursuant to section 282-b of the Highway . Law of the State (added by Laws of 1922, chap. 612, as amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 315). Upon motion for summary judgment a default was suffered by the defendant who *457thereafter sought to be…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Devlin v. New York Mutual Casualty Taxicab InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Dean v. MarshallNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Schroeder v. Columbia Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ancateau ex rel. Trust Co. of Chicago v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- In Re the Exploration Permit Renewal of Silver King Mines, Permit Ex-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- GENERAL ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSUR. CORPORATION v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Materazzi v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.