Legal Opinion

Harlow v. Mason

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 15, 1915PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Fulton Circuit Court; R. E. Jeffrey, Judge on exchange; The mere quashing of a summons is not a final order or judgment, and is not appealable. 34 Neb. 5, 51 N. W. 299; 109 N. W. 752; 31 Kan. 218; 43 S. W. 436; 102 Ky. 370; 77 111. App. 203; 406 N. E. 1073; 166 111. 451; 103 S. W. 1134, 83 Ark. 371; 138 S. W. 876; 144 S. W. 522; 14 Ark. 424 ; 85 Bac. 626, 30 Utah 449; 52 S. E. 64, 139 N. C. 446; 149 Fed. 406; 42 So. 610; 132' Fed. 414; 164 Fed. 492 ; 50 S. E.…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Fulton Circuit Court; R. E. Jeffrey, Judge on exchange; The mere quashing of a summons is not a final order or judgment, and is not appealable. 34 Neb. 5, 51 N. W. 299; 109 N. W. 752; 31 Kan. 218; 43 S. W. 436; 102 Ky. 370; 77 111. App. 203; 406 N. E. 1073; 166 111. 451; 103 S. W. 1134, 83 Ark. 371; 138 S. W. 876; 144 S. W. 522; 14 Ark. 424 ; 85 Bac. 626, 30 Utah 449; 52 S. E. 64, 139 N. C. 446; 149 Fed. 406; 42 So. 610; 132' Fed. 414; 164 Fed. 492 ; 50 S. E. 1055; 60 S. E. 136; 53 So. 503; 72 S. E. 189; Id. 515.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant was the plaintiff below and -sued for damages on aeount of an ¡alleged libel. The parties to the litigation are both residents of the State of Kansas, and a suit was brought by appellee in that State to restrain appellant from prosecuting his suit in this State. A decision ¡adverse to the contention of appellee was rendered by the Supreme Court of Kansas. Mason v. Harlow, 91 Kan. 807, 139 Pac. 384. Upon the conclusion of the litigation in that State, ¡appellee filed a motion in the court below' to quash the service of summons, for the reason, among others, that the person who served…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bucklen v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Honerine Min. & Mill. Co. v. Tallerday Steel Pipe & Tank Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Adams v. PrimmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Moody v. Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  5. Winn v. Carter Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Piercy v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Allred v. National Old Line Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Yocum v. Oklahoma Tire & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. Hogue v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API