Ring v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellants (Rings) initiated garnishment proceedings against appellee (State Farm) to enforce a judgment against the judgment debtor/insured’s (Taylor) automobile liability insurance policy. The judgment, in the amount of $1,321,500.00, arose out of an automobile collision between the Ring and Taylor vehicles. State Farm appealed the judgment on behalf of Taylor without filing a supersedeas bond or obtaining an order staying execution. 1
Taylor was insured under an automobile liability policy issued by State Farm. The garnishment proceeding filed by Rings sought not only…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Elmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Cassidy v. Millers Cas. Ins. Co. of TexasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Leal v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.