Legal Opinion

Hart Ex Rel. Hart v. Ronspies

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1966No. 36502PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The district court rendered a summary judgment for plaintiff on the issue of defendant’s negligence. It reserved for trial, however, issues of contributory negligence under the comparative negligence statute, proximate cause, and damages. Defendant has appealed, but plaintiff challenges appealability.

There is no jurisdiction unless the judgment affected a substantial right. See, § 25-1902, R. R. S. 1943; Otte man v. Interstate Eire & Cas. Co., Inc., 171 Neb. 148, 105 N. W. 2d 583. The district court possesses authority to render a summary judgment, interlocutory in character, on the issue of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Maybury v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Otteman v. Interstate Fire and Casualty CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Turpin v. CoatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. KaufmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Blankenship v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Connelly v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Olsen v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Grantham v. General Telephone CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API