Maybury v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The city of Seattle petitions for a writ of certiorari to review an interlocutory order.
Plaintiff sued the city of Seattle for personal injuries arising out of an accident on one of the city’s buses. On January 5, 1959, by pretrial order, the court determined that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to the city’s liability for the alleged damage sustained by the plaintiff, and limited the trial to the issue of damage alone. Although the order in question is labeled “Order for Summary Judgment,” the title is a misnomer and is misleading, for it is not a judgment but…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pullman Company v. FleishelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Board of Comm'rs of State Inst. v. TALLAHASSEE B. & T. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Owens v. KuroWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Mann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- United States v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Tri-Continental Financial Corporation, A. C. Allyn and Company, Incorporated, American Transportation Enterprises, Inc., Equitable Securities Corporation, Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., the Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., and John W. Clarke & Co., Helene Glenmore v. John I. AhernCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Wheatland Irrigation District v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.