Legal Opinion

Turpin v. Coates

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Motion to dismiss proceedings in error. cited Lane v. Fellows, 1 Mo,, 353. Newman v. Dick, 23 111., 338. Lawless v. Reese, 3 Bibb., 479. State v. Wood, 23 N. J. L., 560. King v. Mayor, 36 N, Y., 182, defining “Special Proceedings,” Erie Bank v. Brawley, 8 Watts., 539. Nacooche v. Shaw, 40 Ga., 492. Adams v. Chv/rch, 22 Mich., 79. Coates v. Cunningham, 80 111., 467.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In August, 1880, the plaintiff, as receiver of the Fidelity Savings Bank and Safe Depository, commenced an action in the district court of Lincoln county, against *322Isaac P, Coates, George A. Schufelt and John H. Rea, to recover the sum of $6,011.95, and interest from October 4, 1878. Affidavits for attachment of the property of the defendants were made and filed, and ah order of attachment issued, and returned no property found. An affidavit was then filed, alleging that certain parties named therein, residents of Lincoln county, were indebted to Coates. Copies of the order of attachment and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. William Watson & Co. v. SullivanOhio Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of RGNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jarrett v. EichlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. JacquesNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. GuatneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Currie Ex Rel. Currie v. Chief School Bus Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API