Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1964No. 422, MiscPublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

376 U.S. 202 (1964)

DOUGHTY

v.

MAXWELL, WARDEN.

No. 422, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 24, 1964.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

Petitioner pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

2Per curiam

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

4Cited by154 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API