Legal Opinion
Raylon, LLC v. Complus Data Innovations, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 7, 2012No. 2011-1355, 2011-1356, 2011-1357, 2011-1358, 2011-1359PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Raylon, LLC (“Raylon”) brought three suits against, inter alia, Complus Data Innovations, Inc. (“Complus”), Casio America, Inc. and Casio Computer Co., Ltd., (collectively “Casio”), and Symbol Technologies, Inc, (“Symbol”) (collectively, “defendants”) in the Eastern District of Texas. Raylon alleged that all defendants infringe claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,655,589 (“'589 patent”). The district court consolidated the three suits. After a combined hearing, the court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bryant v. Military Department of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sfa Systems, LLC v. Newegg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Taurus IP, LLC v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Iris Connex, LLC v. Dell, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.