Legal Opinion
Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 11, 2015No. Case No. 10-cv-02066-SIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: ATTORNEYS’ FEES CALCULATION
SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge
Currently pending before the Court is Sidense’s supplemental motion regarding attorneys’ fees calculation. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and for good cause shown, the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
The Court has provided a detailed factual background of this case in its order from August 12, 2014. Docket No. 427. Therefore, the Court limits its background discussion to the procedural history and a description of the contingency fee agreements at issue.
1. Procedural…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Astorga v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- BASF Corporation v. SNF Holding CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
- BUCHANNON v. ASSOCIATED CREDIT SERVICES INCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Flowrider Surf, Ltd. v. Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.