Iris Connex, LLC v. Dell, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT
RODNEY. GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Iris Connex filed suit against eighteen manufacturers of smartphones and tablets, claiming each infringed the Plaintiffs only asset, U.S. Patent No. 6,177,950, which is entitled “Multifunction*832al portable telephone.” This type of litigation often ends before it begins. Early disposition typically results from a settlement between the parties before there is any appearance by counsel in open court. Often the first md last filing requiring the Court’s attention is the submission of an…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Young v. SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Alli Good Govt v. Coaltn Better GovtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- APL Microscopic, LLC v. Greene Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
- Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Alliance for Good Government v. Coalition for Better GovernmentDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.