Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2003No. 01-15779PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Defendants, state officials responsible for the operation of the California Department of Corrections (“CDC”) and the California Board of Prison Terms (“BPT”), appeal an award of attorney’s fees to Plaintiffs, a class of present and future California state prisoners and parolees with disabilities, who prevailed in their action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (“ADA”) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“RA”). We affirm the decision of the district court.1
Background
Plaintiffs brought this action in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Webb v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Martin Vogel v. Harbor Plaza Center, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hernandez v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- L.H. v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.