Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 29, 2014No. Case No. 10-6342-CBM (AJWx)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Corrected Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 668.) This matter is fully briefed and was taken under submission without oral argument.

I.JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(3), and 1367.

II.FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL OVERVIEW

Heriberto Rodriguez, Eric Nunez, Juan Carlos Sanchez, Juan Trinidad, and Carlos Flores (collectively “Plaintiffs”) were prisoners at the Men’s Central Jail (“MCJ”) in Los Angeles, California…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Joshua Kelly v. Timothy WenglerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. (PC) Doe v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. Base v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  5. Base v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API