Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Corrected Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 668.) This matter is fully briefed and was taken under submission without oral argument.
I.JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(3), and 1367.
II.FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL OVERVIEW
Heriberto Rodriguez, Eric Nunez, Juan Carlos Sanchez, Juan Trinidad, and Carlos Flores (collectively “Plaintiffs”) were prisoners at the Men’s Central Jail (“MCJ”) in Los Angeles, California…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joshua Kelly v. Timothy WenglerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- (PC) Doe v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Base v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Base v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.