Legal Opinion

L.H. v. Schwarzenegger

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 6, 2009No. CIV. S-06-2042 LKK/GGHPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs are a class of juvenile parolees who sued various state officials and agencies in order to obtain changes in parole revocation procedures. Upon the stipulation of the parties, the court awarded injunctive relief several months ago. Plaintiffs now seek attorney’s fees and costs. Also pending is plaintiffs’ motion for costs and fees associated with the magistrate judge’s May 14, 2008, 2008 WL 2073958, discovery sanctions order. The court resolves the motions on the papers and after oral argument.

I. BACKGROUND 1

This action was filed on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cotton ex rel. McClure v. City of EurekaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. (SS) Henderson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (SS) Lang v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. C.J. v. Bellflower Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  5. Jose Emilio E.-M. v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API