Legal Opinion

Huebner v. District Court

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1985No. 830, 831, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Chief Judge.

Gisela Huebner and her father, Hans J. Huebner, want a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. The State, however, invoking the so-called “Gerstung Rule,” 1 insists that the Huebners be tried initially in the district court. The State asserts that if either or both of the Huebners are convicted in the district court, he or she would be entitled to a de novo trial on appeal. That trial may be before a jury. The Huebners, fully cognizant of their de novo -jury trial rights, insist that they, as a matter of right, are entitled under the facts of this case…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. In re StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  3. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Kawamura v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Danner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HuebnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Powers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Lucky Ned Pepper's Ltd. v. Columbia Park & Recreation Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. In Re Jeannette L.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API