Hughes v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Anthony Thomas Hughes v. State of Maryland, Nos. 325 and 331, September Term, 2017. Argued: February 1, 2018. Opinion by Sharer, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – APPEALS – ILLEGAL SENTENCE – SCOPE OF REVIEW Appellant’s application for leave to appeal challenging the post-conviction court’s choice of remedies to correct an illegal sentence does not prevent an appellate court from reviewing the post-conviction court’s underlying factual determination that the sentence was illegal and its decision to grant appellant partial relief. Pursuant to Maryland Rule 8-131(a), appellate courts may review any…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Cuffley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Dotson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bivens v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Hughes v. WardenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Malvo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026