Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 7, 2019No. 0325/17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Anthony Thomas Hughes v. State of Maryland, Nos. 325 and 331, September Term, 2017. Argued: February 1, 2018. Opinion by Sharer, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – APPEALS – ILLEGAL SENTENCE – SCOPE OF REVIEW Appellant’s application for leave to appeal challenging the post-conviction court’s choice of remedies to correct an illegal sentence does not prevent an appellate court from reviewing the post-conviction court’s underlying factual determination that the sentence was illegal and its decision to grant appellant partial relief. Pursuant to Maryland Rule 8-131(a), appellate courts may review any…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Cuffley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Dotson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bivens v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  2. Hughes v. WardenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  3. Malvo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API