Legal Opinion

State v. Zimmerman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1971No. [No. 307, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We here consider the question of the proper time and place to raise a contention that a defendant in a criminal case did not knowingly waive — or, more properly under Maryland procedure, elect — a jury trial. We shall reverse the order of the Court of Special Appeals which, when the question of the voluntariness of the election was raised for the first time in that court, remanded the case for a determination of that point.

We do not consider whether an accused may elect a court trial, thereby waiving a jury trial. That is established. Rose v. State, 177 Md. 577, 10 A. 2d 617 (1940) ; Singer…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Grammer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Colvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API